Could this be possible?
I have a question about cosmology observations that I have searched for an answer to or discussions of but cannot find any references directly on what my question raises. Perhaps you can help me.
My question is about the ratios of elemental distribution of star composition and elemental composition throughout the universe and how we came to determine the ratio. It may be significant in how we determine the composition of stars and our universe as we move forward into deep space exploration.
The method I understand of how we determine this ratio is through light emission and absorption spectral analysis of stars and light-emitting bodies.
My question raises concern for a possible observational error 1/5 or 0.20 to the value of 1- (cube route of 2) or approximately 0.26 so a multiple of 1.26. Where observing the light from a sphere comprised of two elements of equal or 50%-50% composition but the physical trend toward forming a shell-type structure may be observed only as approximately 74%-26% composition. 74%-26% with some variation given that most of the bodies ( Stars ) we can observe have rotational eccentricities away from being a perfect sphere and may present margins of difference given these are dynamic systems with only shell-like tendencies or averages.
Our telescopes collect and focus a 2-dimensional plane of light onto sensors that we then carry out spectral analysis on that point of light. A point of light that often comes from a spheroidal body comprised of elements emitting light like stars. So a star is some kind of the core of stuff and then an outer shell of stuff as per our understanding of the life cycle of Stella nucleosynthesis of stars and galaxy cores. Dynamic systems in motion so not perfect spheres and shells but spheroid systems with collated shelling-type tendencies.
Let’s pretend we have a body comprised only of Hydrogen and Helium but in equal amounts. So it’s 50%-50%. I’m not sure if this has ever been observed and I think that through our current understanding of Stella life cycles that other processes occur before a body might ever reach this composition ratio. So let’s pretend simply for demonstrating where this possible observational error may occur in scenarios where 50%-50% may exist but never be observed as 50%-50% but will almost always be observed as 74%-26%. Or indeed at 80%-20% as the minimum margin as you will see in Fig 1. Because of a simple observational perspective correction.
Let’s consider the volume of a unit sphere = r(1)^3 x 4Pi/3.
Let’s now consider the same volume but now distributed as a shell around the original unit sphere. So Volume of r(2) Sphere - Volume r(1) Sphere.. Let’s find the volume of r2 the outer shell and ultimately the value of r(2). We can use surface area considerations and equations too for similar results but with some slight variations. For simplicity of demonstration, volumetrics will suffice as density, mass and gravitational collation and particle valence charge of two elements plays a role in earlier and later articles on similar topics. I like Volumes, Let’s do volumes and just keep it simple for now.
Vol of core sphere r(1) = Vol of Shell with r(2)
Our Unit Sphere has r(1) = 1 unit
-> r(1)^3 x 4Pi/3 = r(2)^3 x 4Pi/3 - r(1)^3 x 4Pi/3
-> 4Pi/3 = r(2)^3 x 4Pi/3 - 4Pi/3
-> 1 = r(2)^3 - 1
-> 1+1 = r(2)^3
-> 2^(1/3) = r(2)
-> 1.26 = r(2) Approximately.
-> 1-1.26 = 0.26 leaving 0.74.. Almost +1/4 r(1)
In our complete star, we now have five-fifths, four for the sphere and one for the shell. This gives us a new unit sphere of r=r(2) which now incorporates the entirety of the light source in this application.
So, of the light being emitted from within the inner unit sphere transferring out through the outer shell of the body will on average of the system appear to any observer to see a ratio of around 76% of the inner-24% or more so 4/5 inner shell with 1/5 outer shell as being the apparent composition. In perfect conditions.
This may be applied to large spheroidal bodies such as stars, galaxy cores and composite nebula where, density and volume occur and we may also apply this to electromagnetic emissions from a simple or complex atomic nucleus. Where symmetry of fields may need also to be considered for field potential variance in more complex Nuclide arrangements.
So I wonder if the determinations of our universe’s composition in ratios may be out by 20% - 26% with the inverse accounting for 80%-74% error where our compositions of Hydrogen to Helium may be closer to 50%-50% or 1:1 than the existing figures.
Our sun is said to comprise of 75% Hydrogen, 24% Helium and 1% (Other heavier elements)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
Our current universe has been determined to be much the same ratio of composition as our sun which is quite fortuitous of our star to be fusing Hydrogen for the past few Billion Years and be the same ratio as the universe by the time we come along to make the observation. The probability of it occurring certainly exists although I wonder how small it is and if perhaps 1-( that probability) might be the chance that our observation considerations at present might possibly have a larger margin of a difference than the authorities of knowledge might like to think.
Our ancient universe just after the Big Bang is said to be something like 75% Hydrogen, 24% Helium and 1% Lithium +(other trace elements). If you’re familiar with my articles then you may be familiar with some of my applications of Lithium in the origins sequences of massive particles and if you’re not then you may enjoy reading and exploring some of my earlier articles. Lithium is unstable and gets reabsorbed in normal hot Stella-type environments where nucleosynthesis happens and so it has been considered that the only place and time where an environment might exist for the production and preservation and distribution of Lithium as a mineral was back at the Hot Big bang with some other fortuitous events.
Perhaps a consideration for if Dark energy and Dark matter theories fail to find particles to account for the error margins they are trying to fix in modelling the universe.
This is an observational question that arose while modelling the universe from something more akin to M=e/c^2 and a Cold Big Bang that has a thermal signature provision for the cosmic microwave background (CMBR). Please feel free to read my other articles and observations. There may be more to come too so stay tuned. I am happy to take criticisms constructive or otherwise and will leave a contact form below.
And don’t forget to check out my Music, photos and designs they incorporate space, biology and the spirit of life and of all life.
Any generous Tips for the musings of my stories, music or designs are more than welcome and certainly help me survive and continue to do what I do. Thank you in advance.
Kind regards
Murry W Rhodes
Would you like to comment?.. That’s great, here’s a form for you to do so. :)